PDA

View Full Version : After reading this has made me think why start from knees???



the count of monte cristo
22-11-2009, 09:57 PM
Things I learnt from Chris Haueter - #1 Starting a roll from your knees isn’t as useful as starting it in different positions.Most grappling clubs start sparring with both people on their knees and whilst this minimises the injuries that sparring on the feet has, I don’t think it’s the most efficient use of limited class time.

I agree that it’s fair and even, but why not start with one person in closed guard, in side control or in back control etc? By doing such a thing you’re in the thick of the action straight away and not dancing around the mulberry bush just to get started.

I think taking such an approach is also a really useful way of building the repetitions of breaking a closed guard, getting out from under side control or keeping on someones back (All fundamental core skills that can never be worked enough).

But you don’t have to stop there you can start from any position.

If for instance you’ve just taught a class on De la Riva guard, how inefficient is it if everyone then starts to roll from their knees? Yes, eventually one person will end up in guard but why not save some time by starting with one person in De la Riva guard? Then if someone progresses to a tap etc, then they end up in De la Riva guard, giving the other person a go. This gives both people a chance to work what has been covered, work opposing sides of the material and is a more efficient use of your time.


The thing I love about this idea is that whilst it seems like you’re giving one person an unfair advantage, it is actually quite fair. Not only does it give both people a chance to work from a certain position but if there is a discrepancy in the ability (White vs Purple belt) then it can give people a chance to work material straight away.

We’ve all been there when the coach has shown some super slick sweep and then you don’t get to work it all night as everyone you roll with pulls guard. Or they’ve shown some top control game and because the person you’re rolling with is really good you don’t even pass their guard and end up for most of the roll under their top control. Now, both scenarios aren’t your partners fault (to a degree, they could give you a chance) it’s just how the roll can end up, but this idea allows both people a go.

I’ve already started this at my gym and it’s how we’re always going to play from now on. I think it’s brilliant for the following reasons:

•It forces people to play weaker aspects of their game, so making for more well rounded grapplers.
•It builds repetition on fundamental/specific skills (Compare 5 side control escapes to 20 in a session).
•It’s allows junior guys the chance to work material against senior guys more easily.
•It spices up rolling sessions - you can change the position each roll or have a ‘Starting point of the week’.
Why not try it yourself? (I sound like Neil Buchanan - UK joke) Not a coach? You don’t need to be, just ask your partner to start in side control or on your back, or if they don’t like the idea - put them in it by giving up your back or letting them pass your guard. Remember you don’t have to work all your grappling game during each roll, you can just focus on certain things.


There is no limit on the use of this idea and I urge you all to try it. I can hear the cynics saying ‘It doesn’t work a natural progression’ or ‘it’s unrealistic for competition’ but I guarantee that if you play this you’ll become more well rounded. Even if you only try this idea for a few rounds each session I guarantee that people will see the benefits.

It’s a Conceptual BJJ dream

Simon Hayes
22-11-2009, 10:29 PM
Great Post.
On Saturdays at Carlson's we have been having 'Half Guard' day,where all the techniques are half guard and sparring is half guard.We will do this for a set period then move onto another position in a few months.

slideyfoot
22-11-2009, 10:29 PM
I agree that it’s fair and even, but why not start with one person in closed guard, in side control or in back control etc? By doing such a thing you’re in the thick of the action straight away and not dancing around the mulberry bush just to get started.

I think Adam (http://conceptualbjj.com/170) from Conceptual BJJ makes a good point (Kev does that at RGA High Wycombe, and I've found it a beneficial way to train), but it is worth noting that there are advantages to starting from the knees. JohnnyS, an Australian black belt, gives his reasoning on this thread (http://www.bullshido.net/forums/showthread.php?t=26554):



Say I escape side control and get to my knees. From there I can back off a little and then put the guy on his back with these techniques.

Say I have the guy in my guard, I can put my foot in his hip, come back to my knees and do the above techniques to put my opponent on my back.

Say my opponent and I end up in a scramble on the ground and get to our knees. We both want to be on top and start passing. These techniques show how to do that.

rjd
22-11-2009, 10:38 PM
We have been doing that for years

Iconoclast
22-11-2009, 10:46 PM
Is it fair to say that most clubs would start from standing if they had the room?

Or does starting from knees actually have it's specific purposes?

Meerkatsu
23-11-2009, 12:21 AM
At Mill Hill we tend to do set position sparring for several rolls, then progress to free sparring afterwards which invariably start from the knees - or in most peoples cases, in open guard sitting on their bum, legs and arms outspread position.
I must admit I don't enjoy set position sparring. It takes me out of my comfort zone. So obviously this is a good thing for me.

warrenb
23-11-2009, 09:19 AM
I do not see the point in starting from the knees. Start either standing if possible or positional.

willow
23-11-2009, 10:26 AM
We do this at Bolton catch.

Whatever technique or position has been taught in the "technical" part of the class is always used to spar for at least 30 mins.
The class is split into two and half the guys go in the middle and the rest basically spar the position.
So if one guy is in the middle he will start as the "attacker" in the attacking position. The guys coming in defends, whoever subs or escapes the position stays in the middle and each guys takes it in turns to spar with everybody else.

We then do some free sparring.

Simples!

TatooineFarmBoy
23-11-2009, 01:52 PM
I reckon starting from knees is OK for beginners, cos you learn some stuff about unbalancing an opponent which can be applied later for standup, however at an intermediate level it is better to start from basically any another position.

When there are only a few people on the mat, WHY NOT START FROM STANDING? Both in BJJ and Judo classes generally seperate the ground practice from stand up, which is a good safety measure on a crowded mat, but if you get a class with a low turnout and lots of spare space, it is the PERFECT oppurtunity to practice the transition between standing and ground work.

Rob T
23-11-2009, 01:58 PM
When starting from knees I will either immediately sit to guard (partner can then stand if they want) or I will go to combat base for a moment; if they pull guard I'll work from top or if they look to clinch I'll pull guard.

Starting from knees is just to get you into a ground fight asap but there is no real value in wrestling from the knees imo. In any real fight situation where you end up both on your knees, the winner will generally be the first to get to their feet.

Starting from standing every time would be great in theory, but I've seen 5 min sparring rounds in class where neither person gets a takedown the entire round. Not much BJJ has been learnt in that situation.

liamwandi
24-11-2009, 04:44 PM
I completely agree with the whole post. The following quote caught my eye...


The thing I love about this idea is that whilst it seems like you’re giving one person an unfair advantage, it is actually quite fair.

Since we are on the mat to learn, and tapping is a tool and not some blind ultimate goal, then fairness is not an issue. I have learned A LOT by starting from unfair positions ;)

excellent post mate.

TatooineFarmBoy
24-11-2009, 05:16 PM
"Starting from standing every time would be great in theory, but I've seen 5 min sparring rounds in class where neither person gets a takedown the entire round. Not much BJJ has been learnt in that situation."

Well obvously ya gotta try some throws and if you fail and get countered then well you start groundwork from a disadvantageous position, but what does that matter in training? And its still more useful than spending 5 minutes on the knees trying and failing to unbalance each other. As sometimes happens.

Rob T
24-11-2009, 05:18 PM
True, and training more from stand-up should also decrease the chances of a total stalemate. It was just an observation.

shakus maximus
24-11-2009, 11:10 PM
we train positions. one week will be guard next week side,next week mount etc
constantly working bad positions underneath and atacking options on top