Changing a result due to for instance, a blatantly wrong result via corruption or otherwise I think is right.
But changing it because "oh - HE shouldn't have been judging in retrospect" is ridiculous!
Printable View
Changing a result due to for instance, a blatantly wrong result via corruption or otherwise I think is right.
But changing it because "oh - HE shouldn't have been judging in retrospect" is ridiculous!
If you agree to a fight you are ready to fight. No excuses. If you agree to judge you are ready to judge fairly. Just because your mate loses you can't change a result.
Bollocks
This. I have judged people I know, I just detach myself from it and watch it as if I don't know them. Not hard in fairness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledge
to be fair, subconscious bias is possible^
When I was at weight watchers class the other night listening to the "why cake is evil" lecture they told me that you should always use a scale to weigh the amount of food your going to eat because your eyes will lie to you when you are hungry.
This psychology undoubtedly applies to friends judging friends in differing quantities depending on the person.
This whole situation is beyond ridiculous if you dont know what you are doing then you really shouldnt be running a show but how many more times are we going to have to say that? probably 99999999999999999999999 (right Mr Carling?)