What was your fight purse?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosi
Printable View
What was your fight purse?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosi
Im going to marinate on this over night and return.
The IMMAF stood up well when challenged and did everything they said they would do which is why I support them 100%.
I hope that SafeMMA too can offer the same robust response in the face of questions that need to be answered.
If they can I personally will offer my support.
excellent news ChrisQuote:
Originally Posted by CHRIS ZORBA
SafeMMA and the IMMAF/UKMMAF are on the same team so to speak, not pressing for different things as you can tell my some of the reps on board. The IMMAF will use what SafeMMA are doing as part of their progression.Quote:
Originally Posted by BakedBean
That sum for a pro fighter for the whole year isn't that much I don't think. You're looking at three times that (minimum) for a pro boxing license according to guys I know that have got them recently.
The cognitive tests that will be performed by a GP are in place to help spot such issues. The fact that strict suspension are in place will also go a long way to preventing fighters taking further damage when concussed. Glad to learn of your support.Quote:
Originally Posted by manimal
Not quite sure how to respond to this as it almost indicates that SAFE MMA should be preparing for a beat down. That said, none of the members are naive and are quite aware of how exciting and also ground breaking this is. SAFE MMA and the UKMMAF have been side by side the whole time with this. Marc and Rosi sit on both boards and are fundamental member to both. SAFE MMA would like everyone to support this which is why it has been put together and considered from every angle; fan, promoter, doctor, coach and most importantly fighter. The Q&A document really is comprehensive, so please chew that over and come back to us with any questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by BakedBean
Good point Jay. the cost of medical deductions at the UFC is pretty horrible too!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay
I don't think I'm at liberty to disclose that, but I don't think it's really relevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by BakedBean
If you can't afford basic blood tests to assure your opponent you don't have any blood borne diseases, then you can't afford to fight!
You either are or you are not, you either want to or do not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosi
Until all the member promotions agree to a minimum wage and multi fight contracts id say it is very relevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosi
You can , you just cant afford to fight on a regulated show but im sure Mark Carling will let you beat some homeless guy up on his.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosi
Regardless I dont want to argue with you as I have too much respect for you and the fact you are involved and defending the scheme gives me much greater confidence.
Im going to take some more time to thoroughly examine the paperwork and then post my questions.
Well, I don't have my contract to hand and I'm not about to go looking for it. :)Quote:
You either are or you are not, you either want to or do not.
If fighters find it's no longer worth their while fighting on a particular show, then no doubt economic pressures will force that show to raise their purses.Quote:
Until all the member promotions agree to a minimum wage and multi fight contracts id say it is very relevant.
No doubt there will still be shows with a lower standard of fighter safety. Or you could go and pick a fight outside your local pub. If, on the other hand, you want to fight on a reputable show where you know your opponent isn't going to infect you with HIV....Quote:
You can , you just cant afford to fight on a regulated show but im sure Mark Carling will let you beat some homeless guy up on his.
I hope you find the answers you're looking for. If not, I'm sure there will be plenty of people happy to help you out :)