Printable View
Reminds me of when had mine done last year. Luckily mine never got that bad that it was close to being lobbed off but hurt like fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly.
The cotton/gauze what they sew to your ear is the worst thing ever too. I sleep on my left side and couldn't as it was my left lug i did and if i strayed onto it in my sleep i sharp woke up.
It's a funny old injury cauli like as you don't realise how much your ears get touched in day to day life/training until you get one.
I fucking love when Geordies drop posts... parts of it almost seem like a foreign language :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan_Court
Technically i'm not a geordie although i would go as far as say i am more geordie than half the geordie shore cast.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly.
remember that fight well. I agre with the commentators though early stoppage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph
Who was it in the UFC who's ear went from normal to JDS ear during a fight a couple of years ago. Can't remember who it was i just remember when Rogan interviewed him after the fight it was brutal.
Remember when Saku got his ear ripped off?
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5004/...d71685357f.jpg
http://cdn2.cagepotato.com/wp-conten...kuraba-ear.jpg
Yup. To this day still makes me cringe!Quote:
Originally Posted by brashleyholland
I turned pro a week or so after my 17th Birthday and although i have done ok i was very badly coached and matched, fighting two weight categories above my natural fighting weight and was thrown in with the likes of Carl Fawcett, Brendan Loughnane, Tim Close and Eden Newton before or when i was 18. If a fighter is from a good gym and is managed correctly i don't see a problem with turning pro before 18.
IMHO for you to have such a good record after being matched with some of the names above is testament to just how good your skills are. There is a lot of full time pros who wouldn't/couldn't beat some of the above yet you did impressively at such a young age.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan Desborough
Many of the posts on this thread are missing the point. The issue is the confused legal status of 16-18 year olds who are considered to be adults in some contexts but not others. Only this morningthere was a news item on BBC breakfast arguing the case why a 17 year old should be treated as a minor when in plice custody. It doesn't matter how good an individual is; it's about the presumed capacity (or lack thereof) of the many individuals who are not that good to meaningfully give informed consent to participation