Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Second World Grappling Committee official meeting

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    284

    Default Second World Grappling Committee official meeting

    From fila-wrestling.com

    The second World Grappling Committee (WGC) annual meeting took place at the FILA headquarters in Corsier-sur-Vevey (Switzerland) on February 28th, 2009. The members of the newly structured WGC were brought together to discuss and establish the standards that will guide the sport of Grappling and its organization for the next four years.

    Attended the meeting Mr. Raphael Martinetti (FILA President), Mr. Jean-François Court (WGC Coordinator), Mr. Jason Towsend (Head of Grappling Pan-America), Mr. Rafael Perlungher (Head of Grappling Europe), Mr. Lazaros Papadopoulos (Head of Grappling Oceania), Mr. Hideo Kamaga (Head of Grappling Asia), and Mr. Willem Putter (Head of Grappling Africa). Under the new WGC structure, the continental representatives will be responsible for supporting the growth and development of the sport in the countries within their respective continents, as well as promoting the organization of FILA sanctioned events and Continental Championships. Contact details of all Committee members are available on the FILA website under “Grappling”.

    After conducting an analysis of the first World Grappling Championship that took place in Lucerne (SUI) on 20-21 December 2008, the Committee decided to bring some modifications to the International Grappling Regulations. The following changes are in effect as of February 2009 and will remain in force until the end of 2012:

    - New weight classes for males: 60, 66, 74, 84, 96, 120 kg and Absolute (open weight category).
    - New weight classes for females: 55, 59, 63, 67 kg and Absolute (open weight category).
    - The referees will no longer be able to declare a technical submission (“catch”) for senior competitions.
    - The duration of senior matches will be 5 minutes with 1 minute overtime.
    - The half guard restart position will no longer be used and half mount will no longer be considered a dominant position
    - 1 point will be awarded for takedowns (if there is top control for 3 seconds).
    - 1 point will be awarded to disadvantaged grapplers if they manage to escape and go to neutral or top position.
    - In overtime, the choice of position, either top or bottom, will be given to the grappler who received the most passivity infractions, and if there is a tie in this criterion, to the grappler who scored the lowest value of points. If no grappler can be decided between by these two criteria, the red grappler will get the right to choose the position,
    - Sweeps shall now be considered escapes and will be awarded points as so.

    Other minor changes were made and can be consulted by downloading the complete International Grappling Regulations here

    Another major decision made in this meeting was to held the second World Grappling Championships in the United States, the American National Grappling Committee will soon announce more details of the competition which will be held in the second semester of 2009.

    Tiago Okamura
    For the World Grappling Committee
    www.fila-grappling.com
    Last edited by Tiago Okamura; 03-03-2009 at 12:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    284

    Default



    The World Grappling Committee Members
    From left to right
    standing: Larry Papadoupoulos, Jean François Court and Hideo Kamaga
    sitting: Raphael Perlungher, Jason Towsend and Willem Putter

  3. #3
    Senior Member Rob T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    9,018

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiago Okamura View Post
    - In overtime, the choice of position, either top or bottom, will be given to the grappler who received the most passivity infractions, and if there is a tie in this criterion, to the grappler who scored the lowest value of points. If no grappler can be decided between by these two criteria, the red grappler will get the right to choose the position,
    Is this correct? If it goes to overtime, the fighter who has performed the worst gets to choose his position?

    What is the reasoning behind this?

    Also, if the fight goes to overtime, surely the points would be equal?
    http://www.ChrisReesAcademy.com - BJJ throughout South Wales

  4. #4
    Senior Member Stalkachu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    431

    Default

    I think that the VALUE there refers to who has the highest scoring individual point award. So someone who scores 6 sets of 2 will be lower scoring than someone who scores 2 sets of 4 and 2 of 2. Or so I believe. As for the loser getting the choice, I guess that must be backwards. @_@

    Take care,

    Stalks

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob T View Post
    Is this correct? If it goes to overtime, the fighter who has performed the worst gets to choose his position?

    What is the reasoning behind this?

    Also, if the fight goes to overtime, surely the points would be equal?
    Yes, you really can't get the whole idea of the rule with just the change.

    The thing is, the person who gets to chose position is in a disadvantage. Because by the rules the person with the right to chose has to score a point withing one minute or he/she looses the match.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stalkachu View Post
    I think that the VALUE there refers to who has the highest scoring individual point award. So someone who scores 6 sets of 2 will be lower scoring than someone who scores 2 sets of 4 and 2 of 2. Or so I believe. As for the loser getting the choice, I guess that must be backwards. @_@

    Take care,

    Stalks
    You are correct, but as I mentioned in the post above, it's not a good thing to get choice of position as you are obliged to score within a minute or you lose the match.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Rob T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    9,018

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiago Okamura View Post
    Yes, you really can't get the whole idea of the rule with just the change.

    The thing is, the person who gets to chose position is in a disadvantage. Because by the rules the person with the right to chose has to score a point withing one minute or he/she looses the match.
    Ok, cheers for that, I understand how it's not an advantage now. Don't personally like the rule but I realise that it's done to be able to get a definitive winner.

    Hopefully I'll be ok to compete in the UK trials for this year
    http://www.ChrisReesAcademy.com - BJJ throughout South Wales

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    490

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiago Okamura View Post
    - 1 point will be awarded to disadvantaged grapplers if they manage to escape and go to neutral or top position.
    www.fila-grappling.com
    Don't agree with scoring points for escaping bad positions - It's your job to escape, the reward for escaping is the fact that you've escaped and are no longer in the shit

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NIKUMAN View Post
    What I want to know is:
    Why is Hideo Kamaga hugging the flag in the picture?
    I supose he thought it would be a good idea to have the FILA flag in the picture.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •