I was also stunned , what are the judges looking for ? split decision ? WTF !!
Another joke in British boxing, another shit poor result
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/8476327.stm
I was also stunned , what are the judges looking for ? split decision ? WTF !!
Another joke in British boxing, another shit poor result
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/8476327.stm
after the final bell Nappa was 1.02 on betfair for the win
those that cant work out those odds thats -5000 on the american sites
if you backed Nappa with 100 pound after the final bell you will have stood to gain £2 profit
it was shocking , you have to knock someone out to be 100% on a win !
I didnt see it all caught the end and watched the highlights. Jim Watt had Nappa by 3, I really rate him as an analyst
how would you have scored it?
It was a great fight, Napa delivered many more shots and of higher quality , he was countering alot but I would have given him the fight by atleast 3 - 4 rounds. I can only remember 2 rounds, 8th and 9th in which Napa didnt do as much and clearly dropped the rounds , the other 2 including the 12 was very close. I couldnt believe it when I heard it was a split decision ... I then turned over to watch Sledge on BBBM which was even worse so i turned back to the boxing![]()
I saw this as well. Napa looked like he was a league above McDonnell. I like to hear the judges justifiication.
Napa won this fight, he was robbed imo.
I agree, had Napa up by 2 rds. Some were close and a bit scrappy but Napa was far sharper IMO