Should MMAMail.com continue doing UK MMA Rankings? + Any Feedback to the rankings?

[mmamail]

We have updated the rankings after Jan/Feb events:

http://mmamail.com/uk/rankings/

As always any feedback or insults are welcome.

If a fighter has been missed out or is ranked incorrectly please post or PM the following details:
Name:
Record:
Weight division:
Last fight:

[BakedBean]

Yes, its a difficult job and it is not possible to get everybody to say "yes thats right" but I have found yours to be the most credible of the UK produced rankings thus far.

[Mike Clarke]

Don't give up guys....you will always have people who don't agree with you, just keep going !

[Nathan_Court]

no phil de fries in the heavyweight rankings? not 100% but sure he is 4-0-0 and has beaten towler twice who is ranked 17th.

[CraigSt.Clair]

No boobs on the poll, I therefore will not vote

[groundskeeperwillie]

I think there will be mistakes and it will take time to get them perfect there will also be people unhappy. but its good to have some rankings to look at ..without a governing body and sanctioning they will never really be officail rankings just websites and magazines own set ....wich i think is still good to look at as opposed to nothing keep it up guys .

[mortimore]

Yea Phil Defries should be on there! Heavyweight 4-0-0

[James-w]

.without a governing body and sanctioning they will never really be officail rankings .

explain please

[TheHat]

Would much rather you didn't just try to list as many people as possible and went with a top 10 or 20

[Jay]

If a fighter has been missed out or is ranked incorrectly please post or PM the following details:
Name:
Record:
Weight division:
Last fight:

That's exactly your problem dude, and if it's been pointed out once it's been pointed out a hundred times so I won't explain again.

Crack on with 'em though if you like them, it's your site and your prerogative.