I think he makes a good argument.
http://www.addictedmma.com/story-New...-Lombard03.php
Bisping a bit put out by hector Lombards potential title shot.
I think he makes a good argument.
http://www.addictedmma.com/story-New...-Lombard03.php
He shouldn't, Lombard would own him.
Knocking out John the baker hahaha.
It's a tough weight class. Lots of guys are at a level where they could make the same argument. I do think that if Lombard beats Stann it shouldn't automatically mean a title shot for him.
I don't blame him but at the same time, I can see it from the UFCs point of view too. They always struggle to present Silva with a credible threat. They're basically just planning on doing what they did with Belfort.
they should switch it and put bisping v lombard, then winner gets title shot
Why should Bisping get a title shot? He lost to Sonnen and automatically deserves a number one contenders match up? Yet Stann loses to Sonnen and then comes off a devastating win in his next bout, he deserves it long before Bispings name even gets mentioned.
He arguably won the Sonnen fight, very very close.Originally Posted by Grizzly.
Seconded, i thought he had too!
To be fair, Sonnen destroyed Stann whereas Bisping handled him for large parts of the fight and lost a very close decision. Stann won his next in impressive fashion but let's be honest, that was against a guy whos last win was two years ago and would be lucky to be considered top 20 let alone top 10.
I can completely understand Lombard being put forward but Stann/Anderson would be an exercise in utter comedy.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote