So if I point out I don't post on here anymore, does that mean I am gonna get the ban hammer. Fucking poor show banning Subz for nothing that.
Jimmy raises a valid point on this - was AG supposed to turn it down when it was offered to him? Seriously? The fighter has to have more intergrity than the promoters who offer the title shot? Any fighter fights, the promoters promote, shouldnt be up to the fighter to dictate that his opponent isnt worthy of making it a title fight.
Also noting Bean you state fighters have already voiced favourable opinions of AG, maybe you need to focus not on AG but the people who put the fight together? I don't see how this is AG's fault?
~gets my best ban outfit ready~